Well, I prefer to use treelike nature of XML more. We can have a lot of
descendant elements (e.g. we add comments afterwards, or something else) and
then XML stucture will become a bit messy. That's just my opinion. And I
didn't say I find current schema perfect :)
2009/6/1 Aristedes Maniatis <ar..sh.com.au>
>
> On 01/06/2009, at 7:30 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
> Also could you please wrap "info" tags in XML to parent tag, e.g.
>> <infoset>
>> <info.../>
>> ...
>> </infoset>
>>
>
>
> Why? I don't think that makes it any easier to parse or manipulate. And we
> don't have ObjEntity wrapped in ObjEntitySet, ObjAttribute in
> ObjAttributeSet, etc.
>
>
>
> Ari
>
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 10:46:38 EDT