On 26/6/09 9:03 PM, Andrei Ionescu wrote:
> Would project Poleposition:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/polepos
> make sense for Cayenne (ORMs) to compare it's speed with other ORMs
> (mainly Hibernate) ?
This is my personal opinion and not an official Cayenne stance: I don't see the value in this. From this text on their web site:
"The use of O-R mapping technology like Hibernate or JDO O-R mappers has a strong negative impact on performance."
Well, that is just not true. Perhaps if all you ever wanted to do is perform one SELECT query and output the result as text, then sure, you could use the database directly. But an ORM gives you Java objects as output which can be cached, managed in a three tier environment. Cayenne gives you prefetching and pagination. These things can result in applications which run several orders of magnitude faster than the same application which goes back to the database for every single piece of data it displays.
So unless Poleposition takes into account these scenarios, it is fairly worthless as a comparison. From what I can see it mostly measures the speed of reading and writing thousands of objects in sequence. I'll guarantee that will be faster in raw SQL than through an ORM of any sort and Cayenne will just look bad to people who don't understand the difference. But so what? Even comparing ORMs on this basis is fairly pointless since not many people use their ORM to regularly write 100,000 records in a batch process into a database.
How long does it take to create a new context? How expensive is it to move objects from one context to another? How much memory does a 1,000,000 object paginated (hollow) list take? How easy is the API to use? These are the important questions.
Just my thoughts. But thanks for pointing it out. We are very interested in any reviews or opportunities you might come across discussing Cayenne or other ORMs.
Regards
Ari Maniatis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jun 27 2009 - 01:25:28 EDT