Wonder if that's such a good idea?
The last time we had dependencies from snapshot repository on
people.apache.org, we had a major problem when it got wiped out
without warning one day. Maybe worth checking with either infra, or
the maven dev list whether they promise any kind of stability on
repository.apache.org, and what is their snapshot pruning policy.
I dread the return of the days of broken Maven builds from the not so
distant past.
Andrus
On Oct 11, 2009, at 4:59 PM, andre..pache.org wrote:
> Author: andrey
> Date: Sun Oct 11 13:59:36 2009
> New Revision: 824078
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=824078&view=rev
> Log:
> changing surefire version
>
> Modified:
> cayenne/main/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: cayenne/main/trunk/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cayenne/main/trunk/pom.xml?rev=824078&r1=824077&r2=824078&view=diff
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> --- cayenne/main/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ cayenne/main/trunk/pom.xml Sun Oct 11 13:59:36 2009
>.. -513,7 +513,7 @@
> </dependency>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> -
> +
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>apache-snapshots</id>
>.. -546,6 +546,20 @@
> <enabled>true</enabled>
> </releases>
> </pluginRepository>
> + <pluginRepository>
> + <id>plugin-snapshots</id>
> + <name>Apache Snapshots Repository</name>
> + <url>http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/>
> + <layout>default</layout>
> + <snapshots>
> + <enabled>true</enabled>
> + <updatePolicy>weekly</updatePolicy>
> + <checksumPolicy>ignore</checksumPolicy>
> + </snapshots>
> + <releases>
> + <enabled>false</enabled>
> + </releases>
> + </pluginRepository>
> </pluginRepositories>
>
> <build>
>.. -553,6 +567,7 @@
> <plugins>
> <plugin>
> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
> + <version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
> <configuration>
> <argLine>
> -Dcayenne.test.connection=${cayenne.test.connection} -
> Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Oct 11 2009 - 10:09:06 EDT