I've used explicit transactions 1x, for a very specific use-case that
required raw sql updates and selects for performance reasons.
So I would say for me, that makes it about 99.9999% that I use
implicit transactions.
Robert
On Oct 28, 2009, at 10/288:45 AM , Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> I've never used anything but implicit transaction management. I never
> knew there was such a thing until the last couple of years :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Michael Gentry
> <mgentr..asslight.net> wrote:
>> For me, and probably every other developer here, it would be > 99%
>> of the
>> time...
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree with the general statement. Implicit transaction
>>> mechanism is
>>> actually the best part of Cayenne 99% of the time compared to
>>> alternatives.
>>> I.e. you don't have to manage transaction at all.
>>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 28 2009 - 11:34:30 EDT