On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Michael Gentry <mgentr..asslight.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>> No question, this can be useful. Where this gets in the way is with our
>> elusive goal of providing persistence for POJOs without a framework-mandated
>> superclass.
>
> Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I actually like inheriting behavior.
> I also like being able to step through the code to see what it does.
You're not alone. I found the whole POJO movement set me back a bit.
Debugging dynamically enhanced classes is a major PITA. Having said
that, issues related to multiple inheritance are also annoying. It
could be a lot easier to introduce persistence into an existing
codebase if you don't have to change the class hierarchy.
-- Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Nov 19 2009 - 09:59:00 EST