Re: DI-based configuration works

From: Michael Gentry (mgentr..asslight.net)
Date: Tue Dec 08 2009 - 09:26:00 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: DI-based configuration works"

    Is creating a separate module needed or would that just add more
    confusion? Would there be yet another JAR that shows up in the Maven
    repository for people to have to decide what they want?

    Seems to me the server side needs to be able to load the model, but
    only the Modeler needs to be able to save.

    mrg

    On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > I been thinking about this step, and decided against moving o.a.c.conf to
    > the Modeler. Instead I am going to create a separate new module
    > cayenne-project-unpublished, implementing project saving/loading
    > functionality with the Modeler use in mind. Once this is done, the Modeler
    > and runtime can be switched to the new stack simultaneously, and o.a.c.conf
    > and o.a.c.project removed from the runtime jars.
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Dec 08 2009 - 09:26:53 EST