Hudson unit test runs

From: Aristedes Maniatis (ar..aniatis.org)
Date: Thu Dec 10 2009 - 22:04:22 EST

  • Next message: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: Hudson unit test runs"

    On 11/12/09 12:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    > On Dec 10, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> How about something really simple like
    >>
    >> if (! System.getProperty("CayenneTestConnection").equals("derby")) {
    >> run test...
    >> }
    >>
    >>
    >> That is, if these test failures are actually for real and SHOULD not
    >> pass on Derby. Otherwise, I'll just configure Hudson to only send
    >> emails when the test failures change from run to run, not when they
    >> remain the same.
    >
    > I think the later option is better for now. IIRC these should work on
    > Derby, but the right implementation is just too quirky and waiting its
    > time.
    >
    > Andrus

    OK, I've done that now. We will not get emails after the first broken build.

    Do we need Jira(s) for the broken tests on Derby? Are they the same issue or two different things?

    Ari Maniatis

    -- 
    

    --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Dec 10 2009 - 22:05:06 EST