They are POJOs. There's no common superclass or interface required as
all communication with framework happens via the owning object.
Andrus
On Dec 29, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> Also, can embeddables be just POJOs? If not, maybe we mark them with
> some
> interface?
>
> 2009/12/29 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andre..mail.com>
>
>> Just started to play with embeddables. I mapped one as shown in
>> this guide,
>> but then at class generation classes with embeddables are not
>> checked by
>> default and I see warning "attribute.name" contains invalid
>> character: .
>> near them
>> What is that? As far as I can tell, if checked manually, classes get
>> generated correctly
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Dec 29 2009 - 04:17:53 EST