On 29/12/09 2:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
>> Not sure this will be of help, but is it OK that tutorial POM does not
>> have
>> a parent while it is referenced by "tutorials"?
>
> It has no parent intentionally for the reason that I mentioned, and yes,
> it is one possible cause why it fails (not that it makes any sense).
I know that fixing the maven version has moved us forward, but the overall install/parent issues are still there. And I just saw this email from the maven people, wanting ASF projects to use this as a parent:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?revision=893969&view=markup
I'm not sure there is huge benefit, although perhaps we could learn from some of the interesting things in their POM.
Ari
----------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Dec 31 2009 - 07:17:44 EST