Hi Ari,
Did they provide any justification for wanting others to use that parent
POM? It strikes me that each project is different enough that a single
parent POM would be more problematic than helpful.
One thing I saw in there that would be nice for us to adopt is the gpg
signing stuff.
-- KevinOn Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar..aniatis.org>wrote: > > > > I know that fixing the maven version has moved us forward, but the overall > install/parent issues are still there. And I just saw this email from the > maven people, wanting ASF projects to use this as a parent: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?revision=893969&view=markup > > I'm not sure there is huge benefit, although perhaps we could learn from > some of the interesting things in their POM. > > > > Ari > > -- > > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Dec 31 2009 - 12:47:15 EST