Re: Jira workflow

From: Kevin Menard (nirvdru..mail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 10 2010 - 12:49:55 EST

  • Next message: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne, release 3.0RC1"

    On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>wrote:

    > On Jan 8, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
    >
    >> 1. merge closed and resolved statuses (we've never really used them
    >> differently)
    >> 2. add a 'waiting for feedback' status which triggers an email to the
    >> reporter with a question
    >> 3. add a new field to all bug reports for the database type
    >> 4. later on, add a timeout to the feedback status which will automatically
    >> close a task which gets no response (perhaps after three months). But that
    >> can come later.
    >>
    >
    >
    > Looks good to me.
    >
    >
    +1

    I've always used "resolved" to mean more feedback or that I'm looking for
    another pair of eyes to verify, but the reality is, it hardly ever happens
    and then I just mark the issue as closed anyway.

    -- 
    Kevin
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jan 10 2010 - 12:50:58 EST