On 21/01/10 9:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> It doesn't have to be, although from slow voting on RC2, I guess as a
> practical matter doing yet another RC is too painful for everyone
> involved :-/
Or else we could agree that this is "only" a release candidate. That is, everyone on the PMC doesn't have to verify the entire package in detail. We could treat the voting as a formality the PMC needs to go through and say "we trust that Andrus is doing the right thing and there is nothing going into svn which looks like a problem". That way we could release RCs more often (which would be useful), and still spend much more time reviewing the final 3.0 release package.
Ari
-- --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 20 2010 - 21:12:05 EST