Will try to on the weekend - but I cannot promise... Actually CAY-1371 is a
major bug and is must-have for 3.0. As for CAY-1367, I've already looked at
it, fix will not be easy, but we'll just need to leave one primary field
from an entity in FROM statement if it exists in group by. IMO we need to
fix 1371, and RC2 can be built without 1367 as it is rather rare case and
can be workarounded (by not specifying group-by path in FROM statement)
Looking forward for fetch joins! :)
2010/1/22 Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
> Andrey, do you have cycles to look at this one? If not, I guess we'll try
> to find some time next week between myself, Olga and Xenia.
>
> I also just looked at CAY-1366 patch, and I feel more and more like it must
> go in 3.0, to make sure EJBQL is usable in 3.0.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Dave Dombrosky wrote:
>
>> Andrus,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at CAY-1367?
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am finished merging CAY-1069 to 3.0. Anybody has anything else before I
>>> create RC2 artifacts?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-- Andrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jan 22 2010 - 15:05:19 EST