Actually Bryan's case seems to be pretty clear. I will try to create a
test case for it now:
> We have a source entity with two to-one relationships to target
> entities that both inherit from the same table. When we try to
> insert a new instance of the source entity, we get:
>
> org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException:
> Error resolving to-one fault. More than one object found. Source
> Id:
> <ObjectId:Claim, CLAIM_ID=8891>, relationship:
> runtimeRelationship0
>
> org.apache.cayenne.access.ToOneFault.doResolveFault(ToOneFault.java:
> 90)
> org.apache.cayenne.access.ToOneFault.resolveFault(ToOneFault.java:
> 54)
>
> Cayenne found two objects in the table and thought it was an error.
On Feb 7, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Guys, we need to do something about CAY-1009. The fix doesn't look
> logical to me, and now it turns out that it breaks other things per
> CAY-1378.
>
> I am looking at commented out test case
> InheritanceTest.testCAY1009() that Kevin created, and from what I
> can tell, Cayenne does the right thing here (without the CAY-1009
> fix). I.e. DirectToSubEntity.subEntities is NOT a reverse
> relationship of BaseEntity.toDirectToSubEntity, so we should not
> expect it to behave as one.
>
> Bryan and Andrey also had problems with "runtime" relationships. So
> could you create test cases for those so we can maybe try looking
> for the another cause is elsewhere? Or maybe you could provide a
> failing mapping and describe the problem?
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>> Andrus Adamchik updated CAY-1378:
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>> Attachment: 0001-CAY-1378-no-reverse-for-inheritance.patch
>>
>> I tend to agree with Victor. Here is my patch reverting CAY-1009
>> commit (plus some minor loop refactoring). This fails uncommented
>> InheritanceTest, but I think the test is wrong. I won't commit this
>> yet, and will take further discussion to the dev list.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Feb 07 2010 - 10:23:56 EST