Agreed. While we do need a cgen version, we don't need it to be part
of the file names or the directory names. It can be in the comments.
I also don't think we need to support cgen 1.1 anymore.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
>> If we really need to show cgen version, i'd rather we do it in templates'
>> comments (##this is template for use with cgen 1.2), not in directory
>> name.
>
> Keep in mind that we may have more than one template version in one distro
> simultaneously, just like we do in Cayenne 3.0 (although I wish we didn't).
>
> Until we face this situation again though, I have no problem if we get rid
> of the version folder.
>
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Feb 19 2010 - 09:44:26 EST