Re: svn commit: r911476 - /cayenne/main/trunk/framework/cayenne-tools/src/main/resources/templates/v1_2/client-datamap-superclass.vm

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 19 2010 - 09:43:32 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: svn commit: r911476 - /cayenne/main/trunk/framework/cayenne-tools/src/main/resources/templates/v1_2/client-datamap-superclass.vm"

    Agreed. While we do need a cgen version, we don't need it to be part
    of the file names or the directory names. It can be in the comments.
      I also don't think we need to support cgen 1.1 anymore.

    On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >
    > On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
    >
    >> If we really need to show cgen version, i'd rather we do it in templates'
    >> comments (##this is template for use with cgen 1.2), not in directory
    >> name.
    >
    > Keep in mind that we may have more than one template version in one distro
    > simultaneously, just like we do in Cayenne 3.0 (although I wish we didn't).
    >
    > Until we face this situation again though, I have no problem if we get rid
    > of the version folder.
    >
    > Andrus
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Feb 19 2010 - 09:44:26 EST