+1. I'll put it on my TODO for 3.0.
On Mar 16, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Dave Dombrosky wrote:
> Is there any possibility of including the encodeAsEJBQL patch from
> CAY-1111 in 3.0? It's not a complete solution for the problem, but it
> does allow you to at least use Persistent objects with a simple PK
> directly in an EJBQLQuery using Expression.toEJBQL(). It's supposed
> to be fully fixed in 3.1M1, but it would be nice to have some expanded
> functionality for now.
>
> I've had my version of Cayenne patched with it for quite some time,
> and it doesn't seem to cause any problems. Just thought it would be
> nice if other people could easily use it too.
>
> -Dave
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 15, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>>> I guess I was assuming there'd be an RC3 and after a couple weeks,
>>> if
>>> nothing reported against it, we'd rebrand it as GA.
>>
>> That actually makes lots of sense to me. For once it will save us
>> from
>> embarrassing last minute bugs and oops moments.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Mar 16 2010 - 02:30:45 EDT