On 31/03/10 12:40 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> This may be a little late, but I just noticed that in the navigation
> sidebar it says "Version 3.0 (beta)" ... should we change that to
> "release candidate" instead of "beta"? Also, once 3.0 is released,
> what label to we attach to 2.0?
'release candidate' was too long and it made the menu break :-( I think people get the idea, and hopefully any minute now we'll change that label again.
As for 2.0, I guess that needs to be voted on. We have two choices:
1. Leave it as 'released' and continue to support it to the extent that critical bugs will be fixed
2. Change it to 'archived' and state clearly that it is no longer supported for bug fixing
I think we actually should have some sort of EOL policy at any rate. It would be nice to tell people what to expect in advance. Something like:
* We will support the current release, plus one previous release
Ari
-- --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Mar 30 2010 - 18:13:43 EDT