On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> I was thinking we'd add a utility type method for now.
Cool.
> I have no
> expectations of modifying 3.0 for this, but was thinking it might be
> good in the future to have something similar.
I am sure we will. I am stumbling over 'localObject' pretty often
myself. It has to be done better.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jul 09 2010 - 16:13:34 UTC