Re: Local Object

From: Michael Gentry (mgentr..asslight.net)
Date: Sat Jul 10 2010 - 17:21:31 UTC

  • Next message: Lachlan Deck: "Re: Local Object"

    Well, if you want it in CayenneDataObject, you'd have to pass the
    target ObjectContext to the method, but that might be a pretty good
    place for it, too.

    mrg

    On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Lachlan Deck <lachlan.dec..mail.com> wrote:
    > On 10/07/2010, at 2:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>
    >>> I was thinking we'd add a utility type method for now.
    >>
    >> Cool.
    >>
    >>> I have no
    >>> expectations of modifying 3.0 for this, but was thinking it might be
    >>> good in the future to have something similar.
    >>
    >> I am sure we will. I am stumbling over 'localObject' pretty often myself. It has to be done better.
    >
    > What about adding to the Persistent interface or its direct implementations: CayenneDataObject / PersistentObject? i.e.,
    > public <P extends Persistent> localObject(P object);
    >
    > Failing that, add it to the default velocity templates... or people can add it to their own in the meantime.
    >
    > with regards,
    > --
    >
    > Lachlan Deck
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jul 10 2010 - 17:22:24 UTC