Maybe instead of putting them into something called Cayenne, it would make
more sense to stick them into something along the lines of CayenneModel.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>wrote:
> This was my concern all along. Calling a class "Cayenne" imposes certain
> expectations. This should be a collection of frequently-used utility
> methods.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> >
> >> I wonder if that
> >> class will just start to become a dumping ground in the future?
> >
> > That's what we certainly should try to avoid.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Aug 23 2010 - 15:33:32 UTC