Re: 3.0.1 - next steps

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Fri Aug 27 2010 - 16:50:21 UTC

Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: PMC's concensus about what we are voting on [was: [VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded]"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Next in thread: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Aug 27, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:

> our
> source package is mostly a svn snapshot (correct me if I'm wrong), and
> a recursive diff tool could compare the two easily.

Yes, it is the exact copy of the SVN tag contents (sans any SCM files, like .svn or .git).

Andrus

Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: PMC's concensus about what we are voting on [was: [VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded]"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Next in thread: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: 3.0.1 - next steps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Aug 27 2010 - 16:51:12 UTC