I agree that we should leave some things for version 2 so we can at least
get a product up and running soon.
-Henry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Adamchik" <aadamchi..obox.com>
To: "ObjectStyle" <cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: entity packages
> I was thinking about it (you've mentioned this before). I agree with the
> value of such approach, but I think this may be version 2 or something.
> This will require some design changes in DataDomain implementation (we
need
> to tie entities with data nodes in one way or another). I'd leave it out
> for now. Everybody else, please cast your votes.
>
> Andrei
>
>
> At 11:29 AM 4/25/2001 -0400, Andriy Shapochka wrote:
> >There is an interesting question. Are we going to introduce the concept
of
> >categories (package in Java, namespace in C++) for our entities. It could
> >be so useful in order to organize our object entities, and in many cases
a
> >developer could use this instead of creating additional data models.
> >
> >--
> >Andriy Shapochka
> >
> >--
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 04 2001 - 16:21:24 EDT