On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 01:42 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Ok. This was mis-information. I have another
> almost-identical-in-format-and-purpose table that this is true for, but
> PENDING_PAYMENT has a primary meaningless key and a foreign key to
> PAYMENT_HISTORY.
>
> So I don't know why it caused a problem. I do see asymmetry in the
> relationships (no reverse for PendingPayment's paymentHistory
> relationship)
> in the model.xml file.
Yeah, missing reverse DB relationship will most definitely case this
problem. See tips #2 and/or #3 from the modeler guide:
http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/modelerguide/modeling-tips.html
> This was an imported EOModel -- is it malformed somehow? Do all
> relationships need to have a reverse relationship defined?
Now why it is missing is another question. It needs further
investigation with your source EOModel. Can you reproduce it? I mean -
import EOModel again, and see if the new resulting map is missing the
relationship as well.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 01:50:21 EDT