Hi Michael,
I think I might know what is causing the latest problem. ObjectId is
used as a key to identify objects in the ObjectStore. So as a map key
it must have a properly implemented hashCode() method. With String or
numeric PKs hashCode() works since it relies on AbstractMap.hashCode()
implementation. With byte[] it does not, since default hashCode for
arrays of primitives seems to be based on identity rather than element
equality. In fact I just wrote a test case that confirms my suspicion.
I will do some more testing, and see how to create a smarter hashCode
implementation. I'll keep you posted.
> PS. Also, "80 80 80 80 80 80 80 A2 CC 20 EE C9" is different than
> yesterday's "[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 34, 76, -96, 110, 73]" ... 0x80 !=
> 0. 0xA2 != 34 ...
Umm, yeah... I am converting each byte to an unsigned form before
converting it to HEX, by adding 128 (-Byte.MIN_VALUE). This does look a
bit odd... I am open to suggestions on the logging format.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 22 2003 - 16:09:04 EDT