Re: Flattened relationships are read-only?

From: Jim Menard (jim..o.com)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 13:15:30 EST

Next message: Jim Menard: "Relationship frustration"

Previous message: Bill Fan: "RE: [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC]ResultSet can not re-read row data for column 7."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Exception in thread "main"
> org.objectstyle.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.1.0.4 December 14
> 2003] Cannot modify (add to) the read-only relationship addresses
>
> What am I doing wrong?

I hate to respond to my own query, but it's right there in the
documentation: "Most of the possible combinations are read only. One
particularly useful combination is read/write. It is many-to-many (n:m)
relationships mentioned above."

Darn. Just because this is a one-to-many relationship (each member can
have many addresses, but each addresses is associated with only one
member), now I have to explicitly deal with MemberAddress objects. Foo.

Jim

-- 
Jim Menard, jim..o.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/
"You might do well to heed the bumper sticker on a laser I had once:
'do not look into laser with remaining eye.'" -- Daniel E. Macks

Next message: Jim Menard: "Relationship frustration"
Previous message: Bill Fan: "RE: [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC]ResultSet can not re-read row data for column 7."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Dec 17 2003 - 13:15:29 EST