On Dec 20, 2003, at 2:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2003, at 11:07 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>
>> You might also define a reverse to-one relationship from photo to
>> album,
>> then do a
>>
>> matchExp("photo.album", theAlbum)
>>
>> in which case you probably wouldn't need the primary key.
>
> IMO this is a preferred solution, there is no reason to use a PK
> directly. You simply need access to the album object and use in the
> qualifier. Though the expression would be more like
>
> matchExp("album", theAlbum)
>
> (or whatever the relationship name is).
Yes, that makes perfect sense. I wasn't thinking in terms of objects,
and forgot that you could put an object into a matchExp, not just the
id number. I was thinking in terms of the database.
Thanks, Mike and Andrus.
Jim
-- Jim Menard, jim..o.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/ "I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind." -- Alan Kay
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Dec 20 2003 - 16:18:20 EST