Hi Andrus,
Thanks very much for your response.
I really need to know two more things though:
1) Can I turn Level 1 caching off? I certainly hope so!
2) If I can - how do I do it?
cheers,
James
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2004, at 6:19 PM, James Treleaven wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> I am looking at deploying my webapp which uses Cayenne across a
>> cluster of webservers, and I just want to make sure I don't get bitten
>> by Cayenne's caching architecture.
>>
>> My understanding is that Cayenne currently does caching within a
>> single Java VM, and that the intention is to provide cross VM caching
>> in the 1.1 release:
>> http://objectstyle.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=CAY-30
>>
>> Is single-VM caching turned on by default? If so, does this mean that
>> if I deploy my Cayenne app across a cluster I will run into problems?
>>
>> thanks,
>> James
>
>
> Hi James,
>
> Let me explain current and future levels of caching in Cayenne. When I
> am talking about DataContexts/DataDomains below, this assumes whatever
> helper objects they are using for caching (e.g. ObjectStore). More
> detailed documentation will be included in 1.1.
>
> Level 1 - No Cache Sharing: DataContext keeps its own cache - whatever
> is fetched from the database via a DataContext is never shared with
> other local or remote DataContexts. Changes made on commit are not
> propagated to other DataContexts.
>
> Level 2 - Local VM Cache Sharing: Each DataDomain keeps the cache shared
> by all DataContexts in the same VM. Changes made via one of the
> DataContexts are automatically shared by other DataContexts in the same VM.
>
> Level 3 - Distributed Cache Sharing: Behaves just like Level 2, but also
> synchronizes caches of DataDomains with the same name across JVMs.
>
> Cayenne 1.0.* implements Level 1 only, i.e. no sharing of cache either
> locally or remotely. Cayenne 1.1 will have all three levels supported,
> configurable via CayenneModeler. Ideally no application code changes
> will be required to switch between the levels. Also this means that 1.1
> is fully backwards compatible with 1.0.
>
> Hope this answers your questions.
>
> Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jan 09 2004 - 20:05:45 EST