Re: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Sun Apr 11 2004 - 12:11:40 EDT

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext"

Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Equivalent to awakeFromInsertionInEditingContext: ?"
In reply to: Craig Jones: "RE: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext"
Next in thread: Craig Jones: "NullPointerException in setReverseRelationship() - Solved"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Craig Jones <crai..ankardsaweigh.com> wrote:
> Elsewhere in the list I saw Andrus call context.localObjects and use
> this as a parameter:
>
> Collections.singletonList(obj)
>
> As opposed to your
>
> Arrays.asList(new Object[] { obj } )
>
> Both seem to convert a single item to a list. Is there any difference?

I doubt it makes much difference. Use whichever you prefer.

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext"
Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Equivalent to awakeFromInsertionInEditingContext: ?"
In reply to: Craig Jones: "RE: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext"
Next in thread: Craig Jones: "NullPointerException in setReverseRelationship() - Solved"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: setting a relationship from the wrong DataContext"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Apr 11 2004 - 12:10:26 EDT