Re: Incremental Database Schema

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:29:55 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Incremental Database Schema"

    "Gentry, Michael" <michael_gentr..anniemae.com> wrote:
    > Yes, that would be nice. :-)
    >
    > I think most of us probably do a first cut and then update the DB
    > manually (keeping the update scripts/etc in the repository) and then
    > update the model manually to reflect the changes. At least, that's the
    > pattern I've always seen.

    I think it's a good idea as well. I also manually update the database and
    model separately after the initial design.

    However, I think it will be quite a bit of work to add this in due to the
    greater variation in SQL for modifying table structures. [But I could be
    wrong.]



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 10:28:15 EDT