Eric Schneider wrote:
> Robert,
>
> There's nothing wrong with your validateForSave() approach, but it's far
> from ideal. It's really stretching the domain validateForSave() for
> was intended for. But, if it works it works.
I agree that it's a stretch. ;) It's one of the reasons I don't really
/like/ the solution, even though it's functional.
>
> Again, I think these workarounds will be temporary. Newer versions will
> address this.
I hope so. =) I'm really enjoying using cayenne beyond this one detail.
Thanks again for the input.
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jul 13 2004 - 17:00:17 EDT