We have had pretty good performance for our 5.2 based application. The only
reason I am even considering a swap is the pricing for WO adds to the cost
of our application. I would be very happy if WO went open source.
I guess I should complain too much - it is certainly cheaper than it was a
few years ago :)
-- Dov Rosenberg Conviveon Corporation http://www.conviveon.com
On 2/10/05 6:00 PM, "Mike Kienenberger" <mkienen..laska.net> wrote:
> Dov Rosenberg <dov.rosenber..onviveon.com> wrote: >> How does cayenne compare to WebObject/EOF when it comes to multi-threaded >> operations? > > For one thing, it will perform non-serialized database operations unlike > WO5.0 and 5.1. I haven't upgraded to WO5.2 yet (on my todo list), but > WO5.2 is supposed to also support non-serialized database operations. > > You can perform as many simultaneous connections as you have specified in > the connectionPool max setting for your driver. > > I know Andrus recently (and often in the past) answered questions about > thread safety issues. I recommend doing a search on the cayenne home page > for "thread safe" and "thread-safe" > > Here's a couple, but you can find more. > > http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-user/2004/12/0104.html > http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-user/2004/04/0006.html > > -Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 10 2005 - 19:55:14 EST