Jonathan,
Does wicket have built-in state management similar to Tapestry? (i.e.
persistent page and component properties, form rewind, etc.).
Thanks,
eric
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Carlson wrote:
> Just to mention...� Wicket is a Tapestry-like web framework that
> hasn't reached 1.0 yet, but seems much simpler to learn than Tapestry
> while still using a pure HTML markup like Tapestry.� When they get the
> UserDoc rewritten to reflect all the changes they've made, it will be
> hard to beat.� (IMHO :-)� The original creater worked at Sun on the
> Swing toolset (don't hold it against him :-) and is a good documenter.
> �
> http://wicket.sf.net
> �
> - Jonathan�
> �
> P.S.� No, I'm not a Wicket developer, but I'm a Tapestry-approach
> admirer who has�been very pleased with how quickly I've become
> productive with Wicket.
> �
>
>
> >>> michael_gentr..anniemae.com 2005-02-11 9:51:07 AM >>>
> Just to beat on the drums some more, Cayenne is my new EOF.� With the
> 1.1 version, Cayenne really became capable of replacing EOF
> (optimistic locking, etc) for my needs.� The GUI modeler is useful
> (compare to open source ORM frameworks).� The framework and modeler
> are under active development.� Plus, you have the source code.� Let me
> repeat: You have the source code!� I've been able to step through the
> code in the Eclipse debugger to figure out what was going on (usually
> my mistake, but sometimes you catch a Cayenne bug and when you report
> the problem, which you can do with great precision, it gets fixed --
> quickly).� The mailing lists are great.� There is an energy here that
> is missing with EOF/WO.
> �
> I've started using Tapestry a bit, too.� I'm by no means an expert,
> but it seems to be WO-like.� Has some nice things compared to WO, but
> lacks some things in WO, too (can't reuse bindings is a big
> annoyance).� Cayenne works great inside Tapestry.� Cayenne + Tapestry
> + Tomcat: Free.� Having the source code: Priceless.
> �
> /dev/mrg
> �
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dov Rosenberg [mailto:dov.rosenber..onviveon.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:52 PM
> To: cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org
> Subject: Re: Cayenne vs EOF: How to questions?
>
> That is good to hear. How dramatic of a change is it to move from EOF
> to Cayenne? Are you using Tapestry as well? Have you come across
> anything that has given you pause about Cayenne?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> --
> Dov Rosenberg
> Conviveon Corporation
> http://www.conviveon.com
>
>
>
>
> On 2/10/05 6:37 PM, "Bryan Lewis" <brya..aine.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> On the first question, I'm currently converting several old apps from
> WebObjects 4.5 to Cayenne and have had no trouble keeping our old
> flattened relationships. �See the user's guide:
>
> http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/modelerguide/modeling-object-layer/
> flattenedrel.html
>
> �
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> �
> From: �Dov Rosenberg <mailto:dov.rosenber..onviveon.com> �
> �
> To: cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org �
> �
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:52 �PM
> �
> Subject: Cayenne vs EOF: How to �questions?
> �
>
> A few questions on the capabilities of Cayenne as �compared to Apple
> EOF
>
> �
>
> 1. Does Cayenne support flattened relationships like �EOF? If so,
> what is the equivalent? �
> 2. I �understand that Cayenne does not currently support
> EOPrototypes to make it �easier to switch between databases, what is
> the Cayenne preferred method for �supporting multiple databases? Seems
> like it has something to do with �DataMaps. Not sure though �
> 3. How �can I programmatically swap out my connection dictionary
> at application �startup? I.e. Allow me to store userid/password in
> separate file from the �cayenne.xml and update them when the app
> starts up. �
> 4. Is �there a hook for generating primary keys on the client side
> similar to what �we currently do with a DatabaseContextDelegate and
> our own guid generator? ��
> 5. Is �there any Cayenne support for doing lightweight, high
> volume SQL processing �(i.e. For batch updates)? EOF has too much
> overhead for large amounts of sql �processing in batch mode. Ideally a
> smarter version of RawRowsForSQL that �doesn�t create all the objects
> in an object �graph.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> www.katun.com
> **********************************************************************
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Feb 14 2005 - 12:11:39 EST