Tore Halset wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> What about dropping point 2 and use optimistic locking at point 3? It
> someone else has taken that candidate you will just have to try once
> more.
I have a feeling we're on to something now: I wasn't clear on what
optimistic locking really is...not sure if I am now, for that matter.
Would it be too much if I asked you to illustrate how you would do this?
From what I can tell, I'd retrieve an object from a table with
optimistic locking set, and try to save the timestamp until I can
confirm that a row was updated - how do I confirm the update took place?
Does cayenne somehow take care of this for me?
Regards,
Tomislav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 11 2005 - 08:19:32 EDT