RE: Tapestry integration options

From: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\) ("Gentry,)
Date: Tue May 03 2005 - 09:53:13 EDT

  • Next message: Erik Hatcher: "Re: unit testing Cayenne objects"

    That's exactly why we want nested DataContexts. :-)

    You do your wizard/multi-step process in a nested DataContext and if
    they finish the last step, you can commit it all. If they run off
    elsewhere, no harm done and it falls out.

    /dev/mrg

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Cris Daniluk [mailto:cris.danilu..mail.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:17 AM
    To: cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org
    Subject: Re: Tapestry integration options

    [snip]

    I also agree, by the way, that its a bad general idea to span like
    that. I'm not worried so much about the commit not coming (that
    problem takes care of itself... ) as I am about the user browsing to
    an entirely function without completing the multi-step process, thus
    leading to all sorts of inconsistency.

    Cris



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 03 2005 - 09:53:18 EDT