Re: Partial commits or two DCs?

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:07:09 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: Partial commits or two DCs?"

    I'd say you'd want a new DC.

    The problem with partial commits is that you then have to deal with
    relationships on committed objects that point to objects that won't be
    committed.

    If there aren't any dependencies between the objects, then putting
    them in separate DCs isn't a problem. And if there are dependencies
    between committable modified objects and uncommittable new objects,
    you aren't in a committable state :)

    On 9/12/05, Kevin Menard <kmenar..ervprise.com> wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > In my webapp, I'm finding that in some scenarios I really only want
    > to commit modified objects rather than new ones. One solution would
    > be to just defer the registration of the new ones, but since there
    > are relationships between these new objects, they must be registered
    > with a DC. So, what I'm wondering is if there's some way to do a
    > partial commit or if I should place these new objects into their own
    > DC. If I go with the latter, what are the ramifications of doing so?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Kevin
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:07:10 EDT