+1
On 9/29/05, Robert Zeigler <rdzeigl...arizona.edu> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Robert
>
> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This discussion started on cayenne-devel, but as Mike Kienenberger
> > pointed out, this is of interest to all users, so I am transferring it
> > here. So far the consensus was that Cayenne 1.1.x should maintain JDK
> > 1.3 compatibility for as long as needed, while 1.2 should go JDK 1.4
> > all the way.
> >
> > The decision has not been made yet. Any comments?
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >> From: Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
> >> Date: September 28, 2005 3:41:39 PM EDT
> >> To: Cayenne Devel <cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org>
> >> Subject: Poll: JDK 1.3 support
> >> Reply-To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
> >>
> >>
> >> I was wondering if there any users out there who deploy on JDK 1.3?
> >> Ok, I know there are WebObjects installations out there that use JDK
> >> 1.1.8, but we won't go that far :-) ... Any major J2EE container
> >> vendor shipped versions in the past 2 years that do not support 1.4?
> >>
> >> I'd like to eventually clean up the code, ridding it from 1.3
> >> workarounds (such as no nested exceptions support, a need to use
> >> third-party regexps, collections, etc.). Also it is an issue of
> >> testing - it takes extra time to test with 1.3... So maybe not in
> >> Cayenne 1.2, but maybe in 1.2.1 we can do such switch.
> >>
> >> Any comments?
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 28 2005 - 22:48:00 EDT