+1
On 9/28/05, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This discussion started on cayenne-devel, but as Mike Kienenberger
> pointed out, this is of interest to all users, so I am transferring
> it here. So far the consensus was that Cayenne 1.1.x should maintain
> JDK 1.3 compatibility for as long as needed, while 1.2 should go JDK
> 1.4 all the way.
>
> The decision has not been made yet. Any comments?
>
> Andrus
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
> > Date: September 28, 2005 3:41:39 PM EDT
> > To: Cayenne Devel <cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org>
> > Subject: Poll: JDK 1.3 support
> > Reply-To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if there any users out there who deploy on JDK 1.3?
> > Ok, I know there are WebObjects installations out there that use
> > JDK 1.1.8, but we won't go that far :-) ... Any major J2EE
> > container vendor shipped versions in the past 2 years that do not
> > support 1.4?
> >
> > I'd like to eventually clean up the code, ridding it from 1.3
> > workarounds (such as no nested exceptions support, a need to use
> > third-party regexps, collections, etc.). Also it is an issue of
> > testing - it takes extra time to test with 1.3... So maybe not in
> > Cayenne 1.2, but maybe in 1.2.1 we can do such switch.
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Sep 29 2005 - 08:39:42 EDT