To add to what Malcolm and Andrus have said, I have been using Click for a
while now (coming from 9+ years of WebObjects/EOF, most recently Tapestry),
using Click with HiveMind and Hibernate in combo. I have 3 Click apps
working extremely well (and fast!), and it really is a breeze compared to
Tapestry (and WO if I am honest) to develop web apps. I recommend giving it
a serious look. And be prepared to be knocked out by the documentation.
Have fun!
Geoff
On 14/10/05, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Malcolm!
>
> Just wanted to mention that I highly recommend everybody doing webapp
> development to take a look at Click, even in its current pre-release
> state. You'll be surprised how well it compares with established Java
> web technologies. Very simple, very easy to learn, no nonsense.
>
> BTW, I came to this conclusion before there was any Cayenne
> integration on the horizon :-). I can't wait to try the new
> DataObject auto-binding stuff in 0.13.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2005, at 1:18 AM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would like to introduce you to Click: http://click.sourceforge.net
> >
> > Click is an easy to learn J2EE web application framework
> > designed specifically for commercial application development.
> >
> > This is the first version of Click to provide Cayenne support
> > with the Click Extras CayenneForm control:
> >
> > http://click.sourceforge.net/docs/extras-api/net/sf/click/extras/
> > cayenne/CayenneForm.html
> >
> > The next Click release 0.14 is looking to include a small
> > Click Cayenne example web application.
> >
> > regards Malcolm Edgar
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 14 2005 - 02:05:19 EDT