Thanks for the two good answers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrus Adamchik" <andru..bjectstyle.org>
To: <cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: deprecated loggingLevel
> This change is a result of an effort to encapsulate explicit Log4J
> dependency to give us more freedom in the future to select a
> different logging kit. In fact I am taking advantage of it already -
> there is no need for Log4J on the client in a multi-tier app, making
> client apps smaller and faster to download.
>
> And you are right - it was decided not to replace Log4J Level with
> Cayenne's own Level object, as this feature wasn't important (at
> least to the people on the devel list) - see this thread:
>
> http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/2005/09/0221.html
>
> Also see a workaround posted in the bottom of the message above.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Bryan Lewis wrote:
> > While perusing the latest ReleaseNotes I saw:
> >
> > * Deprecated explicit log levels in Query, OperantionHints and
> > DataContext.
> >
> > We started using the explicit log levels a couple of months ago as
> > a way to avoid logging some large and uninteresting SQL
> > statements. Is there an alternative way to do that now, or was it
> > considered to be a useless feature? Just checking before I start
> > touching the code.
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 17:45:47 EDT