Re: limit of objects for in-memory filter?

• Previous message: Eric Schneider: "limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• In reply to: Eric Schneider: "limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Next in thread: Eric Schneider: "Re: limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Reply: Eric Schneider: "Re: limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I've personally run it with close to that number of objects and not
had a problem... but there are limitations as to what the in-memory
filtering can do. Can you paste an example of the expression that
works via query, but not in-memory?

Cris

On 12/2/05, Eric Schneider <eric.j.schneide..mail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if there is some sort of limit on how large a list
> can be to perform an in-memorty filter? I have a rather large list
> (~9500 objects). My call to qual.filterObjects(results) always
> returns 0. The expression works fine with a regular query.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>

• Next message: Eric Schneider: "Re: limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Previous message: Eric Schneider: "limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• In reply to: Eric Schneider: "limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Next in thread: Eric Schneider: "Re: limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Reply: Eric Schneider: "Re: limit of objects for in-memory filter?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Dec 02 2005 - 15:02:42 EST