Re: Generic DataObjects?

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 08 2005 - 16:10:38 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Generic DataObjects?"

    Ahmed,

    Almost all of this is already possible. The only thing that
    currently isn't (or wasn't) possible is creating new instances of
    Entities, because those DataContext methods required a class parameter
    with the same name as the Entity name.

    On 12/8/05, Ahmed Mohombe <amohomb..ahoo.com> wrote:
    > > So
    > > we may actually get EOGenericRecord functionality for free as a result
    > > of this change, though extra testing is required to be entirely sure.
    > Very, very interesting :).
    > Does this mean that it will be able to handle tables created while Cayenne is running?
    > If yes, what about a graceful handling if some tables are deleted (that were only
    > mapped in that generic way) ?
    >
    > Thanks in advance,
    >
    > Ahmed.
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Dec 08 2005 - 16:10:39 EST