Following up on the EJB3 discussion, here is my thoughts after
reading the spec:
http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/2006/01/10/
Read between the lines: "we can do it, but we will need dedicated
volunteer help" ;-)
Andrus
On Dec 4, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Hi Mirko,
>
> I also need to educate myself more on the subject. IMO Back in the
> day it was a smart decision on our part to stay away from both
> entity beans (duh!) and JDO. EJB3 however looks like a more
> promising standard. Still I do not want to spend all the time on
> EJB3, sacrificing other important things.
>
> So right now there is no immediate plans for EJB3, but at least I
> am going to keep my mind open and do more research later when 1.2
> goes Beta and we start planning for the next release cycle.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2005, at 2:25 PM, Mirko Viviani wrote:
>> Ciao,
>>
>> I've quickly read the EBJ3 persistence draft and I'm interested to
>> know the opinions of Andrus and
>> other cayenne developers for this 'standard'.
>>
>> Cayenne will follow the api and config specification (and probably
>> design decision) in a future release
>> like Hibernate and TopLink or this is not a priority or a
>> development direction?
>>
>> Just a question, I don't know deeply this draft and I don't want
>> to start flames.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Ciao
>> Mirko
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jan 10 2006 - 20:44:06 EST