Problem with connections leak

From: noban (noba..andex.ru)
Date: Thu Feb 09 2006 - 06:15:30 EST

  • Next message: Gary Jarrel: "Cgen task"

    Hi everybody!

    I`ve found a bug in my Eclipse RCP based application. Looks like it is connections leak.
    How can I test that?

    As well my application is promting for login/password during startup and I`m creating context like this:

        Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(
            this.
            getClass().
                getClassLoader());
        
        DefaultConfiguration conf = new DefaultConfiguration();
        conf.addClassPath(Messages.getString("LoginModel.CayenneConfigXMLPath"));
        Configuration.initializeSharedConfiguration(conf);
            
        Configuration.bootstrapSharedConfiguration(this.getClass());
        DataSource dataSource;
        try {
                String connectUrl = null;
            connectUrl = Messages.getString("LoginModel.jdbcConnectParam");
            dataSource =
            new PoolManager(Messages.getString("LoginModel.driverClass"),
                             connectUrl,
                                ResourceLogin.DB_MIN_CONNECTIONS,
                            ResourceLogin.DB_MAX_CONNECTIONS,
                            login,
                            password);

            Configuration config = Configuration.getSharedConfiguration();
            DataDomain domain = config.getDomain();
            DataNode node = domain.getNode(Messages.getString("LoginModel.Node");
            node.setDataSource(dataSource);

            return Configuration.getSharedConfiguration()
                                .getDomain()
                                .createDataContext();

        } catch (SQLException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
            return null;
        }

    I think it is too heavy, what would be the best practice way to create context? 

    -- 
Яндекс.Почта: объем почтового ящика не ограничен! http://mail.yandex.ru/monitoring/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 09 2006 - 06:15:48 EST