I've reported this a few times and been told by Andrus its probably
the driver's fault. While I tend to agree, I've never taken the time
and energy to verify that it is the driver, and why.
I've had the problem on 8.0 and 7.4 as well. In fact, it tends to only
happen on the subsequent revers engineers (the initial one works
fine). I will try to spend some time tracking this down tomorrow and
Saturday... while its probably a JDBC driver problem, there may be a
Cayenne solution.
On 3/9/06, Tomi NA <hefes..mail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> > All I can recommend is to make sure that the version of the driver
> > with the version of the DB match. COnstraints reengineering works for
> > me on 8.0.*. I remember there were reports about problems with
> > *older* versions, but never the newer ones.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
>
> I've just switched to a 8.1_p404 version of the jdbc driver and got the same
> results.
> The only thing that comes to mind that I did different this time is that I
> placed all my tables in a named schema instead of using the default.
> ...I've just tried that and it's not the problem: I defined a relationship
> between two tables in the public schema and got the same result as before.
> Does anyone else use postgresql 8.1.x (8.1.2, in my case) on linux with
> cayenne 1.2M10 or similar? Can you reengineer the database with all the
> relations defined?
> This is obviously not a showstopper, but it's certainly the type of work
> ORMs are designed to do for you, so I'm reluctant to do it by hand...
>
> Tomislav
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Mar 09 2006 - 14:30:10 EST