On 3/10/06, Cris Daniluk <cris.danilu..mail.com > wrote:
>
> There's some sketchy documentation of this issue:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2002-06/msg00088.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-08/msg00098.php
>
> However, the JDBC driver project is run in a bit of a vacuum, so its hard
> to say if any good would come from telling them. Most likely, we'll have to
> submit a patch to them, or workaround in Cayenne.
>
The first problem is possibly related to what we're talking about: the
second is not (there are no composite keys of any sort in my database).
I've asked on the pgsql-jdbc mailing list if someone there knew anything
about this. The response couldn't have been any different, really, as I
can't provide any real details:
"If you can get some info about exactly what the postgresql driver is
returning that is incorrect or not what cayenne expects, then you might
make some progress.. Otherwise this is a bit vague."
The complete thread is available at
http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.interfaces.jdbc/browse_thread/thread/41c765c91f2c4ca6/29e9cd36678435e1#29e9cd36678435e1
Can someone provide more precise information so that the jdbc developers
could get a better idea of what the problem is?
Regards,
Tomislav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Mar 11 2006 - 09:54:10 EST