Marcin,
I ported your test to B1 and ran it on my machine - it works without
any errors. Can you confirm whether this is still a problem?
BTW, I noticed one minor thing in the mapping - you should not
populate "Client Superclass" field. This field is for the "wedge"
class that may optionally be inserted in the inheritance hierarchy
between cayenne.Persistent and _MyObject.
Andrus
On Mar 28, 2006, at 2:49 AM, Marcin Skladaniec wrote:
> Hello
> I tried with cayenne 1.2M12 but have the same problem.
> Here is a small project based on the 3t example from sandbox
> reproducing the malfunction I'm seeing. (http://
> smokidwa.freeshell.org/work/test.zip)
> all jars needed to run project are on http://smokidwa.freeshell.org/
> work/
> Marcin
>
> On 27/03/2006, at 5:56 PM, Tore Halset wrote:
>
>> On Mar 19, 2006, at 23:48, Marcin Skladaniec wrote:
>>
>>> I created a brand new project and I'm still having this problem.
>>> Double-checked out the relations, the data types are matching.
>>> I have done some more testing and found that one-to-many and many-
>>> to-many flattened relations work. That is only many-to-one that
>>> not works.
>>> What else can be wrong ?
>>
>> Can you create a small test-project to reproduce this behaviour?
>> It will make it easier for us to help out.
>>
>> - Tore.
>
> -------------------------->
> ish
> http://www.ish.com.au
> Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
> phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Apr 08 2006 - 06:35:02 EDT