On Apr 28, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Bryan Lewis wrote:
> Hmm, I must be missing something. I looked at CAY-414
not ready to comment on that now. The validateFor* suggestion is
actually not related at all.
> and looked for
> related changes in the latest code, but didn't grok it. I tried the
> validateFor methods, but they still get called for phantom
> changes... I
> tried adding to a to-many
I think this one is a bug in the algorithm. Will need to investigate.
> and setting an attribute to its current value.
Now this is strange. If you can confirm this behavior, then this is a
bug. I think you have other changes to the object in question though.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 28 2006 - 17:40:35 EDT