Hi Friedrik,
Yes this is not a Cayenne specific question, so I am a bit hesitant to
discuss this here.
This would be a good question to pose, on the click-user mail list:
http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=82095
A one paragraph summary would be that Click is much easier to learn
and use, than Tapestry or Wicket, especially if you dont like writing
HTML. Its a much simpler framework, and also provides good Cayenne
integration.
If you want some more details please send me a email.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On 6/8/06, Fredrik Liden <flide..ranslate.com> wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> Click looks interesting. I don't have much experience of these template
> based frameworks but I'd like to try it out sometime when time permits.
> How would Click compare to Tapestry and Wicket? Is there any pros and
> cons we should know about?
>
> I know this isn't a Cayenne question but perhaps other people would be
> interested as well. If not my apologies.
>
> Thanks,
> Fredrik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Malcolm Edgar [mailto:malcolm.edga..mail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:55 PM
> To: cayenne-use..ncubator.apache.org
> Subject: Click 0.20 is now available
>
> Hi All,
>
> Click release 0.20 is now available. This release includes an examples
> application which features Cayenne and Spring integration.
>
> This is a significant release with many new features, improvements and
> fixes. For change details please see:
>
> http://click.sourceforge.net/docs/roadmap-changes.html
>
> PLEASE NOTE you are highly recommended to upgrade to this release,
> which includes a number of major bug fixes.
>
> regars Malcolm Edgar
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 07 2006 - 19:21:15 EDT