Re: Tapestry tutorial advice

From: Geoff Hopson (geoff.hopso..mail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2006 - 09:56:21 EDT

Next message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: loading another datadomain"

Previous message: Tore Halset: "loading another datadomain"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Next in thread: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Next in thread: Lindsay Steele: "Re: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Reply: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> > Andrus as a person with WO experience, which of the other
> > frameworks do you think works the best?
>
> I like Click. Don't know how representative this is of a "former WO
> user" :-)
>
> Andrus
>

I like Click as well. Tapestry doesn't "feel" right to me, kinda
kludgy after WO. Click is clean and simple, debugging is a breeze,
nothing magic going on under the covers, render chunks of pages
(forms, tables etc) completely in code, xhtml compliancy right there.
Certainly faster to develop with and seems to run faster too.

That's two...

Next message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: loading another datadomain"
Previous message: Tore Halset: "loading another datadomain"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Next in thread: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Next in thread: Lindsay Steele: "Re: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Reply: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Tapestry tutorial advice"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jun 09 2006 - 09:56:44 EDT