Re: Re: Cayenne web site

From: Michael Gentry (blacknex..mail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2006 - 15:07:59 EDT

  • Next message: Tomi NA: "Re: Re: Cayenne web site"

    Does the incubation text have to be at the very top of the page,
    though? I could see a description of Cayenne followed by the
    incubation text.

    I haven't read much of the other comments (yet). I do agree with
    Borut that old news is bad news. Better to not even have a news
    section if it is very stale. I might can add more comments later
    after I catch up ...

    Thanks,

    /dev/mrg

    On 9/20/06, Kevin Menard <kmenard@servprise.com> wrote:
    > Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > > On Sep 20, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Borut Bolčina wrote:
    > >> 1. The fact that Cayenne is undergoing a process for Apache family is
    > >> not nearly as important to be the first thing a user sees on the
    > >> front page.
    > >> As Kevin stated, this can easily suggest the immaturity of the
    > >> framework.
    > > This is a legal requirement. It must be there on the front page.
    > Interesting. I guess I'll have to review the incubator requirements
    > before opening my mouth again. It just strikes me as odd that it's the
    > first thing people read. If I was unfamiliar with Cayenne, that message
    > would be absolutely meaningless to me *shrug*
    >
    > --
    > Kevin
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 20 2006 - 15:08:08 EDT